The
UAB NADs technology is mature and ready for optimization.
The key to success will be a discovery program that creates
a pharmaceutical product, which has appropriate stability,
absorption, metabolism, and safety profiles to allow its
use in animal experimentation. Following completion of
this work, a formal preclinical development program will
optimize the doses; institute allometric scaling; characterize
the safety in at least two animal models; and complete
the anthrax efficacy, dose response, and pharmacokinetic
(PK) profile in animal. Then, a formal Investigational
New Drug (IND) application will be submitted to the FDA,
and two normal volunteer studies will be conducted: a
single-dose, dose-escalating safety, tolerance, and PK
Phase I clinical trial, to be followed by a multi-dose
safety, tolerance, and PK Phase I clinical trial. These
studies will be correlated with information from preclinical
(animal) safety, PK and efficacy with the human trial
experience. Since it is unethical to conduct anthrax interdiction
trials in humans, surrogates of plasma and tissue concentrations
obtained from animal interdiction studies will be used
as correlates and inferences of the human experience.
The
Food and Drug Administration has recently proposed regulations
for the development of new drugs to be used against lethal
or permanently disabling toxic substances, including agents
that may be used in biological warfare (published in the
Federal Register Vol. 64, No.192, (Oct. 1999: Evidence
Needed to Demonstrate Efficacy of New Drugs for Use Against
Lethal or Permanently Disabling Toxic Substances When
Efficacy Studies in Humans Ethically Cannot Be Conducted).
The recent approval of Ciprofloxacin for B. Anthracis
treatment partially validates this approach.
In
collaboration with PPD Discovery, and The University of
Alabama, VDDI has developed a preclinical and clinical
strategy in accordance with these new regulations, and
will discuss this strategy with the FDA at a pre-IND meeting
to be scheduled.
In
summary, the specific design of our lead compounds, in
conjunction with our preliminary in vitro and in vivo
data suggest that:
The
lead compounds have minimum inhibitory concentrations
(MIC) values against B. Anthracis that are quite acceptable.
The lead compounds have minimum inhibitory concentrations
(MIC) values against MRSA and vancomycin resistant Enterococcus
faecium and E. faecalis, that is as good or better than
clinically approved antibiotics Some of the lead compounds
show specificity against gram positive, but not gram negative
strains, thus reducing some adverse effects of clinically
approved antibiotics Some of the lead compounds show excellent
activity against virulent and attenuated strains of B.
anthracis. The mechanism of action of the compounds is
specific to prokaryotic cells, thus leading to a great
safety profile for clinical use. Product development issues
that remain to be resolved include:
Development
of parenteral agents; Development of orally active agents;
and Development of a relatively long half-life product.
DARPA has supported the initial funding for this program
($6 Million). USAMRIID supported the early synthetic chemistry
and in vitro studies with several strains of B. anthracis
and has just agreed to refund $300,000 for this work performed.
VVDI has received an NIH R43 SBIR Phase I grant for $135,000.
Additional support is requested from the Department of
Defense and will be used to complete the synthetic chemistry
and initiate the preclinical development program. Specifically
$2 Million is needed immediately, and will be spent as
allocated by the time and resources as outlined in the
enclosed Proposal. Additional funds necessary to complete
this development program and their respective utilization
are shown in summary format in Table 1. A greatly detailed
timescale and deliverable assessment for this program
is also included in the proposal.